CC BY 4.0 · 2018-07-24
SGC · Cumbal volcanic hazard
Five official geometries clipped to the demonstration extent.
Open source ↗OPERATIONAL CASE · GEOHAZARD · CUMBAL
This case combines three public sources to answer one question: which loaded buildings cartographically intersect each hazard level. It is reproducible screening, not an alert or an individual risk assessment.
This workflow demonstrates one GeoSAT OpenGIS capability. It does not prove universal equivalence with MapGIS or a specific installation: validation is performed workflow by workflow.
SGC in the extent
public IGAC sample
historical SGC inventory
geometric classification
Verifiable snapshot · Retrieved 2026-07-17
The versioned snapshot contains five hazard zones, 450 buildings and two historical mass movements. The geometric overlay classifies 433 buildings in medium hazard and 17 in low hazard within the selected extent. The overlap can prioritize review; it does not establish vulnerability, risk, evacuation or structural condition.
GeoSAT OpenGIS
The workflow preserves provenance and separates GeoSAT calculations from facts published by each authority.
The server queries only predefined SGC and IGAC services; the browser never supplies an upstream URL.
Geometry is clipped to the case extent, unnecessary identifiers are removed and the public response is capped at 500 features.
Building–hazard coincidence is calculated as a cartographic intersection and labelled as GeoSAT analysis, not an official SGC or IGAC attribute.
Users can filter levels, select geometry, measure and export the selection with license, date and attribution.
Every layer has an explicit origin, reuse license, data cutoff and attribution.
CC BY 4.0 · 2018-07-24
Five official geometries clipped to the demonstration extent.
Open source ↗CC BY 4.0 · 2020-03-10
Two published historical events inside the loaded extent.
Open source ↗CC BY-SA 4.0 · 2026-01-31
A bounded 450-building sample, normalized without unnecessary identifiers.
Open source ↗No. It shows cartographic coincidence between public layers. Risk assessment requires vulnerability, complete exposure, scenarios and competent validation.
The interface identifies fallback mode and uses a versioned snapshot of the same sources. It does not replace Cumbal with another municipality.