Geoportals and web GIS viewers
We design web geospatial platforms with architecture, publishing, accessibility, operations and evolution costs defined from the start.
PRIMARY INTENT
geoportal and web GIS viewer development
BUYERS
Public organizations with territorial data · Companies with distributed operations · GIS and digital transformation teams
EDITORIAL REVIEW
2026-10-18
A geoportal creates value when it publishes trustworthy information, helps users complete a real task and can still be operated after launch. We design WebGIS viewers and platforms around those three conditions: defined users, governed sources and fundable operations. The interface matters, but it depends on earlier decisions about updates, permissions, performance, accessibility and support.
Architecture before screens
Discovery identifies who searches, edits or downloads; which layers are public, internal or restricted; and how frequently each source changes. We review spatial databases, OGC services, APIs, files, providers and identity systems. The resulting architecture assigns responsibilities across catalogue, storage, services, caching, application, observability and editorial workflow. It can coexist with ArcGIS, QGIS, PostGIS or other platforms when the combination is consistent with existing licences and contracts.
We also set performance budgets. A complex national layer cannot be published like a small municipal inventory. The team agrees scales, generalization, tiles, query limits and behaviour when a source is unavailable. A visible fallback should explain service status instead of leaving an empty screen when WebGL, a font or an external provider fails.
What the operating team receives
An engagement may include a user and task map, target architecture, functional prototype, API design, publishing configuration, accessibility controls, tests, operating guide and evolution plan. Metrics connect to actions such as locating an asset, comparing scenarios, downloading a source or reporting an issue, not only counting page visits.
OpenGIS demonstrates an open geospatial architecture with identified sources and a working mapping experience. Its local estimator explores how layers, users, updates, availability and integrations affect the design. The output guides discovery but is neither a quotation nor a substitute for infrastructure and security review.
The Medellín geographic platform case uses public contractual evidence. It describes the documented object and scope without turning them into proof of unpublished results. That precision enables a useful experience comparison.
Preparing a scope conversation
A productive starting brief includes three priority tasks, a source list, approximate volumes, access profiles and availability expectations. We separate launch from operations across build, cloud, support, data updates and continuous improvement. This allows an organization to compare alternatives by total cost, control and maintainability rather than the appearance of an initial demonstration.
VERSIONED REGULATORY REGISTER
Sources and verification date
Intersectoral Commission for Geographic Information and ICDE
Agreement 003 of 2025
in force · 1.0, December 2025
The dates published by the authority are inconsistent, so no countdown is shown. The auditor is diagnostic and does not provide ISO or OGC certification.
PUBLIC CONTRACT
Medellín geographic platform: public contractual object
A case limited to the scope documented in public procurement, without claiming adoption, performance or benefits that the cited source does not demonstrate.
Review scope and limits →LOCAL TOOL
OpenGIS and architecture estimator
A functional viewer and local estimator for comparing layers, sources, users and operational requirements. Results are directional and require technical validation.
Estimate preliminary architecture
Focused viewer: publishing, caching, monitoring and simple recovery.
Readiness diagnostic only. It is not certification, official validation or an acceptance guarantee.
CLUSTER GUIDES
What a geoportal costs: scope the system before asking for a number
How to estimate a geoportal from data, users, functions, integrations, security, availability and operations without publishing universal prices.
Read guide →Sustainable WebGIS architecture: five layers beyond a disposable viewer
Data, service, application, security and operations design that lets a geoportal change its interface without rebuilding rules or sources.
Read guide →CONTEXTUAL RELATIONSHIPS
Geospatial data interoperability
Inventory, metadata, quality, catalogues and OGC services aligned with Colombia’s ICDE framework.
GIS for road management
Road inventory, condition, interventions and traceability on a maintainable geospatial model.
GIS for territorial planning and POT
Layer, determinant, metadata, schema and monitoring readiness for POT processes.
Territorial intelligence with DANE data
Official statistics and geography integrated for prioritisation, coverage and planning.
Frequently asked questions
Is a geoportal just a website with a map?
No. A sustainable geoportal also requires data publishing, search, permissions, accessibility, monitoring, updates and accountable operations.
Can ArcGIS, QGIS, PostGIS and OGC services be integrated?
Yes, where versions, licences and source contracts permit it. Architecture should reflect existing systems and actual consumption needs.
Does the estimator provide a final quotation?
No. It organizes scope variables; a proposal requires review of data, integrations, availability, security and service-level needs.
COMMERCIAL CONVERSATION · TRANSPARENT QUALIFICATION
Tell us what you need to solve
The answers help prioritise the conversation. The score is not stored or sent until you submit this form.